Beryl M762 vs M16A4
Beryl M762
M16A4Beryl M762 vs M16A4 comparison: The Beryl M762 has a 0.30s TTK while the M16A4 has 0.30s. See full damage, recoil, and meta analysis.
AIThe Analytical Verdict
"Both weapons perform almost identically in close-quarters combat, making the choice a matter of personal preference and recoil control."
* Results are based on "perfect accuracy" scenarios & standard target health.
| Beryl M762 | Stat Comparison | M16A4 |
|---|---|---|
| 43 | Base Damage | 43 |
| 565 | DPS | 565 |
| 0.304s | TTK (Close) | 0.304s |
| 500m/s | Bullet Velocity | 500m/s |
| 300ms | ADS Speed | 300ms |
| 250ms | Sprint-to-Fire | 250ms |
| 5 | Shots to Kill | 5 |
| 30 | Magazine | 30 |
| 2.500s | Reload Speed | 2.500s |
Time-to-Kill / Range Analysis
๐ TTK by Range
๐ฏ Who Wins in Each Scenario?
Ranked & Competitive Play
In ranked, close-range consistency is king. The faster TTK of the M16A4 makes it the meta choice.
Beginner Friendly
Easier recoil control makes the M16A4 much more forgiving for new players.
Sniper Support
The versatile range of the M16A4 pairs perfectly with a Sniper Rifle.
๐ Time-to-Kill (TTK) & DPS Analysis
When analyzing raw combat efficiency, Time-to-Kill (TTK) is the most critical metric. In the 0-10m range, the Beryl M762 delivers a TTK of 0.30s, while the M16A4 clocks in at 0.30s.
The M16A4's faster firing cycle allows it to shred armor 0.0% quicker than the Beryl M762.
In terms of Damage Per Second (DPS), the Beryl M762 outputs 565 damage, compared to the M16A4's 565.
๐ Recoil Control & Effective Range
Controlling your weapon is just as important as its raw damage. The Beryl M762 features a challenging recoil pattern.
At medium range (20m+), damage drop-off begins to impact performance. The Beryl M762 retains 85% of its damage, resulting in a mediocre TTK of 0.38s.
๐ Handling & Tactical Mobility
In competitive situations, handling speeds often dictate the winner of a surprise engagement. The Beryl M762 features an ADS speed of 240ms, while the M16A4 transition takes 240ms.