1983 Volvo 242 Turbo Evolution vs 2013 Renault Clio RS 200 EDC

AI Telemetry Verdict:In this head-to-head, the 2013 Renault Clio RS 200 EDCholds the statistical edge in Performance Index (575). For the technical touge passes of Mount Fuji, the 2013 Renault Clio RS 200 EDCis the superior technical chassis due to its refined lateral G-force profile.

Live Telemetry Analysis — May 2026 Edition
1983 Volvo 242 Turbo Evolution
C 540

1983 Volvo 242 Turbo Evolution

Volvo
VS
2013 Renault Clio RS 200 EDC
C 575

2013 Renault Clio RS 200 EDC

Renault
Top Performer
2013 Renault Clio RS 200 EDC

"In a head-to-head battle, the 2013 Renault Clio RS 200 EDC edges out the 1983 Volvo 242 Turbo Evolution primarily due to its exceptional Performance Index performance."

1983 Volvo 242 Turbo EvolutionMetric2013 Renault Clio RS 200 EDC
540Performance Index575
4.8Speed5.6
4.9Handling5.8
4.5Acceleration5.2
4.2Launch4.9
4.6Braking5.4
4.8Offroad3.8
135Top Speed (MPH)143
2950Weight (lbs)2646
RWDDrivetrainFWD
18,000Price (CR)18,000
🚦
Drag Race
2013 Renault Clio RS 200 EDC
🏎️
Track Attack
2013 Renault Clio RS 200 EDC
💨
Drift Zone
1983 Volvo 242 Turbo Evolution
🏜️
Offroad King
1983 Volvo 242 Turbo Evolution

📈 Technical Data Analysis:

Speed & Acceleration Analysis

When it comes to straight-line performance, the 1983 Volvo 242 Turbo Evolution boasts a speed rating of 4.8, while the 2013 Renault Clio RS 200 EDC hits 5.6.

The 2013 Renault Clio RS 200 EDC pulls ahead in long stretches, making it a formidable opponent on the Tokyo highways.

Handling & Cornering Dynamics

In the tight technical sections of the Mount Fuji passes, handling is everything. The 1983 Volvo 242 Turbo Evolution features a handling score of 4.9, whereas the 2013 Renault Clio RS 200 EDC manages 5.8.

The 2013 Renault Clio RS 200 EDC maintains superior stability through high-speed sweepers, minimizing the risk of traction loss.

Launch & Braking Efficiency

Off the line, the 1983 Volvo 242 Turbo Evolution uses its 4.2 launch rating to grip and go, while the 2013 Renault Clio RS 200 EDC relies on its 4.9 rating.

Braking from high speeds is equally critical; the 1983 Volvo 242 Turbo Evolution stops with a score of 4.6, while the 2013 Renault Clio RS 200 EDC records 5.4.

🏁 Race Scenario Breakdown

Highway Sprint (Tokyo Loop)
2013 Renault Clio RS 200 EDC

Higher top speed rating allows for sustained high-velocity overtaking.

Touge Battle (Downhill)
2013 Renault Clio RS 200 EDC

Superior braking and handling allow for more aggressive entry and exit speeds.

Dirt Trails (Kyoto)
1983 Volvo 242 Turbo Evolution

Suspension travel and tire compound optimization for loose surfaces.